clawd/econometrics-quick-drills.md

6.1 KiB
Raw Blame History

Quick Practice Drills — English

t-Tests, Confidence Intervals, Hypothesis Testing


Drill 1: Simple t-Test

Given:

  • Sample size: n = 38
  • Estimated coefficient: β̂ = 2.4
  • Standard error: SE = 0.9

Test: H₀: β = 0 vs H₁: β ≠ 0 at α = 0.05

Your tasks:

  1. Calculate the t-statistic
  2. Find degrees of freedom
  3. Find critical value (two-tailed, α = 0.05)
  4. Make your decision: Reject or fail to reject H₀?
  5. Calculate the p-value range using t-table
Answers
  1. t = (2.4 - 0) / 0.9 = 2.667
  2. df = 38 - 2 = 36 (simple regression)
  3. Critical value ≈ 2.028 (or use 2.042 for df=30, 2.021 for df=40)
  4. |2.667| > 2.028 → Reject H₀
  5. From t-table: 2.434 < 2.667 < 2.750 → 0.01 < p < 0.02

Drill 2: One-Tailed Test

Given:

  • n = 55
  • β̂ = -1.8, SE = 0.7

Test: H₀: β ≥ 0 vs H₁: β < 0 at α = 0.01

Your tasks:

  1. Calculate t-statistic
  2. Find critical value (one-tailed, α = 0.01)
  3. Decision?
Answers
  1. t = (-1.8 - 0) / 0.7 = -2.571 → |t| = 2.571
  2. df = 53, one-tailed critical at α=0.01: ≈ 2.404
  3. 2.571 > 2.404 → Reject H₀ (evidence that β < 0)

Drill 3: 95% Confidence Interval

Given:

  • n = 42
  • β̂ = 3.6, SE = 1.2

Your tasks:

  1. Construct 95% confidence interval
  2. Interpret the interval
  3. Does this interval contain 2.0? What does that tell you?
Answers
  1. df = 40, t₀.₀₂₅ = 2.021 Margin = 2.021 × 1.2 = 2.425 CI: [3.6 - 2.425, 3.6 + 2.425] = [1.175, 4.025]

  2. We are 95% confident the true β lies between 1.175 and 4.025

  3. Yes, 2.0 is in the interval → We cannot reject H₀: β = 2.0 at α=0.05


Drill 4: Multiple Regression Test

Regression output:

Variable Coefficient Std. Error
Intercept 5.2 2.1
X₁ 1.5 0.4
X₂ -0.8 0.6
X₃ 2.1 0.9

n = 65

Your tasks:

  1. Test each slope coefficient at α = 0.05
  2. Which variables are significant?
  3. Construct 90% CI for X₁
Answers
  1. df = 65 - 3 - 1 = 61, critical value ≈ 1.96 (or 2.000 for df=60)

    • X₁: t = 1.5/0.4 = 3.75 → Significant
    • X₂: t = -0.8/0.6 = -1.33 → |1.33| < 2.0 → Not significant
    • X₃: t = 2.1/0.9 = 2.33 → Significant
  2. X₁ and X₃ are significant at 5% level

  3. 90% CI for X₁: t₀.₀₅,₆₁ ≈ 1.671 Margin = 1.671 × 0.4 = 0.668 CI: [1.5 - 0.668, 1.5 + 0.668] = [0.832, 2.168]


Drill 5: CI for Hypothesis Test

Given:

  • 95% CI for β: [0.5, 3.2]

Test: H₀: β = 4.0 vs H₁: β ≠ 4.0 at α = 0.05

Your task: Use the CI method to test this hypothesis.

Answer

4.0 lies outside the 95% CI [0.5, 3.2]

Reject H₀ at α = 0.05

The hypothesized value 4.0 is not a plausible value for β.


Drill 6: Interpretation Check

Given: β̂ = 2.3, p-value = 0.08

Which statements are correct?

  • The effect is not statistically significant at 5% level
  • There is an 8% probability that β = 0
  • If H₀ were true, there's 8% chance of seeing this result
  • We are 92% confident there is an effect
  • At 10% level, the effect would be significant
Answers

Correct: ✓✗✓✗✓

  • ✓ Not significant at 5% (0.08 > 0.05)
  • ✗ P-value is NOT probability H₀ is true
  • ✓ Correct interpretation of p-value
  • ✗ Confidence and significance are different concepts
  • ✓ Would be significant at 10% (0.08 < 0.10)

Drill 7: Full Problem — Coffee Shop Prices

Scenario: A researcher studies coffee shop prices in 28 cities.

Model: Priceᵢ = β₀ + β₁Rentᵢ + β₂Wageᵢ + uᵢ

Output:

Variable Coefficient Std. Error
Intercept 1.50 0.80
Rent (€100/m²) 0.25 0.08
Wage (€/hour) 0.15 0.12

Questions:

  1. Test if rent affects price at 5% level
  2. Test if wage affects price at 5% level
  3. Construct 95% CI for rent coefficient
  4. A politician claims each €100 rent increase raises price by €0.40. Test this claim.
Answers
  1. Rent: t = 0.25/0.08 = 3.125, df = 25, critical ≈ 2.060 3.125 > 2.060 → Significant

  2. Wage: t = 0.15/0.12 = 1.25, |1.25| < 2.060 → Not significant

  3. 95% CI for rent: t₀.₀₂₅,₂₅ = 2.060 Margin = 2.060 × 0.08 = 0.165 CI: [0.25 - 0.165, 0.25 + 0.165] = [0.085, 0.415]

  4. Politician claims β₁ = 0.40. Is 0.40 in the CI [0.085, 0.415]? Yes! (0.40 is inside the interval) → Cannot reject the politician's claim at 5% level.


Drill 8: Quick Calculations

Calculate mentally or with scratch paper:

β̂ SE n k t-stat Significant at 5%?
4.0 1.5 30 1 ? ?
-2.5 1.0 50 2 ? ?
0.8 0.3 100 3 ? ?
1.2 0.9 25 1 ? ?
Answers
β̂ SE n k t-stat df critical Significant?
4.0 1.5 30 1 2.67 28 2.048 Yes
-2.5 1.0 50 2 2.50 47 2.012 Yes
0.8 0.3 100 3 2.67 96 1.985 Yes
1.2 0.9 25 1 1.33 23 2.069 No

Formula Sheet

t-statistic:

t = \frac{\hat{\beta} - \beta_0}{SE(\hat{\beta})}

Confidence Interval:

CI = \hat{\beta} \pm t_{\alpha/2, df} \times SE(\hat{\beta})

Degrees of freedom:

  • Simple regression: df = n - 2
  • Multiple regression: df = n - k - 1 (where k = number of X variables)

Common critical values (two-tailed):

df α = 0.10 α = 0.05 α = 0.01
25 1.708 2.060 2.787
30 1.697 2.042 2.750
40 1.684 2.021 2.704
60 1.671 2.000 2.660
120 1.658 1.980 2.617
1.645 1.960 2.576

Practice these until you can do them in your sleep! 🎯